no_yes_prop_8
 

NO or YES on Prop 8, YOU Decide    

 

Prop 8 will change back the right to Californians' that marriage will be between a women and a man only ( not man to man or women to women). If passed again, the California State Constitution will be amended. Prop 8 restores the definition  “Only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California”.

Backgrounder
This year in a 4-3 decision the California Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is constitutional and declared man to man and women to women couples have legal right to marry as women to man couples ( this ruling overturned a voter approved statue called proposition 22 March 2000 ). And in 2005, California passed AB 205, granting Domestic Partnership (and superseding a previously-enacted domestic partnership registry) to same-sex couples, essentially granting all the rights of marriage to same-sex couples. The primary difference between domestic partnership and marriage in California is the manner in which couples register for domestic partnership and dissolve a domestic partnership.

If Prop 8 Passes
The Justices will more than likely revisit their decision and may decide to have all civil marriages called "civil unions” so the State of California will license and sanction only civil unions. Churches and religious organizations can approve/recognize a marriage.
 


AGAINST   FOR
~ Will be a loss of retail sales tax ( e.g. receiving gifts, etc ) because they will only be a domestic partnership, not a married couple.

~
Marriage is the institution that conveys dignity and respect to the lifetime commitment to same-sex couples.

~
They would lose the benefits of filing taxes married in California. And they do not incur the “marriage penalty” since Federal government only allows women-man to file taxes as married.

~ Marriage is a fundamental right, in the same way it is like freedom of religion, free speech.

~ The State should not let the taxpayers decide that man to man and women to women couples can  marry.
  ~ Same sex-marriages may get more tax benefits than women-man marriages; since, they would have to file single. The federal government does not recognize marriages of same-sex couples and they cannot file joint federal income taxes or receive federal spousal benefits. They would not incur the federal “ marriage penalty”.

~ Same-sex marriage will impact court cost when these couples divorce     ( recent study by economist Ben Scafidi found that single parenthood and family dissolution costs California taxpayers $4.8 billion a year). An increase in single parenthood ( when children are involved )and family dissolution, generating additional costs to taxpayers.

~ Lawyers may try to file class action suits against the churches for discriminating if they don’t marry a same-sex couple.

~ Churches may be sued over their tax-exempt status if they refuse to allow same-sex marriage in their religious buildings open to the public.

~ Religious adoption agencies may be challenged by government agencies to give up rights to place children in homes with both a mother and father.

 

YES